Still being punished for resisting war

March 23, 2010

WHEN THE bus carrying military resisters and others entered the gates of Fort Dix, New Jersey, in July 1973, I had plenty reason to be frightened. Reports, both published and rumored, had circulated for years about the bald-faced torture that had been carried out at the stockade on the base.

Decades later, I addressed that issue in "When Torture Was Practiced on U.S. Soil" (ZNet, July 2008) in detail. The only reason I was saved from being thrown in the stockade in 1973 was that I had a good civilian lawyer who was able to argue on my behalf before the company commander of the detention barracks located outside the gates of the stockade.

Nonetheless, I was discharged with bad paper from the Army, and it would take the "amnesty" instituted by President Jimmy Carter in 1977 for me to receive an upgraded discharge.

In fact, both so-called amnesties of Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter fell far short of providing meaningful relief to those who resisted the Vietnam War in the military--instead granting far more lenient terms to those who had resisted the draft. Only about 28,000 men out of the hundreds of thousands (about 500,000) of military resisters received any relief at all for their opposition to the Vietnam War, while their counterparts who opposed the draft got off far easier.

Of the several thousand resisters who applied through both amnesty programs for relief, only a few thousand (I am one of them) received upgraded discharges. Even more punitive, many soldiers (those who had not opposed the war) who had bad discharges were able to get veterans' benefits after discharge, while the vast majority of those who were granted amnesty were denied benefits. So in the end, many veterans who opposed this unpopular war were made to pay a stiff price for their opposition.

Late in the 1970s, I wrote the FBI asking that the record of my arrest for my opposition to the war be expunged. The response was "not a chance!" Once you've got a record, you've got one for life was the unstated return message the FBI had sent me.


I DIDN'T think much about the issue for over two decades, until I applied for teacher certification in Florida in 2005.

Following the terror attacks of 2001, a new security apparatus was in place in the U.S., and I don't know if that is why education officials momentarily held up my application for teacher certification. They wrote that I would be investigated by the state teacher fitness board due to my arrest by the FBI that came to light when the state completed a background check of me as part to the certification process.

It took months to process my appeal (with a favorable result), which consisted of enlisting the aid of a U.S. senator and providing a copy of my upgraded discharge to the certification board. Had it not been for Carter's partial amnesty, I would have been out of luck in this new national security environment. The message seemed to be that those who oppose war are suspect.

The next test of my record left over from the Vietnam era was when the opportunity arose to take a position as a census worker during the 2010 census. I had applied to the local Census Bureau for the job, taken the written test and provided all the necessary documents to apply for the job.

Once again, the U.S. Census Bureau flagged my application because of the FBI arrest record. And once again, it took the intervention of a U.S. senator and supplying my discharge papers to put the application for work back on track.

Disgusted, I inquired of the same senator's office (who I had coincidentally worked for during the 2004 presidential campaign) and learned just how to go about attempting to get the record of my arrest expunged. I had to file a motion for expungement at the federal district court that had jurisdiction over the geographical area where I was originally arrested by the FBI. It wasn't an arduous procedure, and now I wait to learn whether or not I will get the relief that I believe is long overdue from the federal government.

The Vietnam War came to be a hugely unpopular war by the late 1960s. Who knows how many millions of Southeast Asians were ultimately killed, and how many tens of thousands of Americans were killed and maimed by the war?

It took the far right about a decade to put a positive spin on that war by way of the "noble cause" rhetoric on the part of the Reagan administration. Not a single soul lost in that war was brought back to life by that slogan.

For those like myself who became more and more disenchanted as the war dragged on and who resisted military service, the price the nation exacted often continues today.

Amnesty means forgiving and forgetting. Unfortunately, in the case of the U.S. government, a full and complete amnesty never took place following the Vietnam War.
Howard Lisnoff, from the Internet

Further Reading

From the archives